DISTINCTION BETWEEN SIGNIFIER AND SIGNIFIED
INTRODUCTION
Saussure took the sign as the organizing concept for
linguistic structure, using it to express the conventional nature of language
in the phrase "l'arbitraire du signe". This has the effect of
highlighting what is, in fact, the one point of arbitrariness in the system,
namely the phonological shape of words, and hence allows the non-arbitrariness
of the rest to emerge with greater clarity. An example of something that is
distinctly non-arbitrary is the way different kinds of meaning in language are
expressed by different kinds of grammatical structure, as appears when
linguistic structure is interpreted in functional terms.
WHAT IS STRUCTURALISM?
Structuralism is the name that is given to a wide range of
discourses that study underlying structures of signification. Signification
occurs wherever there is a meaningful event or in the practice of some
meaningful action. Hence the phrase, "signifying practices." A
meaningful event might include any of following: writing or reading a text;
getting married; having a discussion over a cup of coffee; a battle. Most (if
not all) meaningful events involve either a document or an exchange that can be
documented. This would be called a "text." Texts might include any of
the following: news broadcast; an advertisement; an edition of Shakespeare’s
King Lear; the manual for my new washing machine; the wedding vows; a feature
film. From the point of view of structuralism all texts, all meaningful events
and all signifying practices can be analyzed for their underlying structures.
Such an analysis would reveal the patterns that characterize the system that
makes such texts and practices possible. We cannot see a structure or a system
per se. In fact it would be very awkward for us if we were aware at all times
of the structures that make our signifying practices possible. Rather they
remain unconscious but necessary aspects of our whole way of being what we are.
Structuralism therefore promises to offer insights into what makes us the way
we are.
THE SIGN (LINGUISTICS)
A linguistic sign is a part of language used to indicate a
being. Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure created the classic model of
linguistic signs, where a sign comprises an arbitrary, bilateral relation
between a signified and signifier. The model has been criticized and other model
has been proposed.
There are many models of the linguistic sign. A classic model
is the one by the Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure. According to him,
language is made up of signs and every sign has two sides (like a coin or a
sheet of paper, both sides of which are inseparable).
DISTINCTION BETWEEN SIGNIFIER AND SIGNIFIED
De Saussure divides the sign into its two aspects. First
there’s the bit that you can see or hear. Actually you can imagine signs that
are accessible to each of the senses. The laboratory technicians at Chanel, for
instance, have an acute receptivity to the smallest nuanced difference between
scents. In this case they are literally "readers" or
"interpreters" of scent in so far as they are able to identify minute
differences. So if you can see, hear, touch, taste or smell it you can probably
interpret it and it is likely to have some meaning for you. Audible and visible
signs have priority for Saussure because they are the types of sign that make
up most of our known languages. Such signs are called "verbal" signs
(from the Latin verba meaning "word").
The signifier is a sign or symbol that can stand for
something else. By definition all words are signifiers since they always stand
for something else (e.g. a through, a feeling, or a thing). A signifier is used
by the person wanting to communicate.
The signified is what the sign or symbol represents
i.e what it is interpreted to mean by the receiver of communication.
Signifier signified
Red to
stop or danger
Heart a
symbol of love and Affection
Brown Cross a
symbol of Christianity
Blue a
colour often associated with sadness or the sea
Smoke an
index of fire
CONCLUSION
The
signifier as the form that the sign takes and the signified as the concept to
which it refers" A crucial point about these two components is they
are arbitrary. In other words, "there is no logical connection"
between them. This differs from a symbol, which is "never wholly
arbitrary". The idea that both the signifier and the signified are
inseparable is explained by Saussure's diagram, which shows how both components
coincide to create the sign.
Comments
Post a Comment